As the human rights risks may change over time, due diligence should be a regular, on-going exercise, which should be part of JCB’s policy statement on human rights This process should go beyond simply identifying and managing material risks to the enterprise. In line with the OECD Guidelines and Due Diligence Guidance, JCB should also set out a plan on how it will integrate and act upon the findings of its due diligence – including how impacts will be addressed – if adverse human rights impacts are identified in its supply chain. #Jcb Serial Number Search code#This statement should be separate from its statement on Modern Slavery, Supplier’s Code of Conduct and the Dealer’s Charter.Ĭarry out human rights due diligence to assess actual and potential human rights impacts. Write a statement of policy which expressly states its commitment to respect human rights as stated in paragraphs 74 and 75 below. The UK NCP also found that JCB did not observe its obligations under paragraph 5 of Chapter IV by not carrying out human rights due diligence in its supply chain The UK NCP concluded that JCB did not fully observe the Guidelines under paragraph 4 of Chapter IV by not having a policy commitment to respect human rights. Findings and recommendationsĭuring its examination, the UK NCP assessed if JCB had observed its obligations under paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Chapter IV of the Guidelines.ĭuring its examination the UK NCP found that JCB did not breach its obligation under paragraph 3 of Chapter IV of the Guidelines by virtue of its relationship with Comasco. The UK NCP in particular examined JCB’s business relationship with Comasco and if the alleged human rights impacts can be linked to JCB directly or indirectly by the virtue of its business relationship. The Initial Assessment was published 12 October 2020, subsequently the parties were offered mediation, which was declined by JCB.ĭuring the further examination process, the UK NCP examined the evidence, submissions and documents provided by both parties. The UK NCP rejected the complaint under paragraph 1 and 2 of the Guidelines. The complaint alleged that JCB’s products and construction machinery were used in the demolition of Palestinian properties and settlement-related construction that caused adverse human rights impacts.Īt the Initial Assessment stage, the United Kingdom’s National Contact Point ( UK NCP) for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises ( the Guidelines) accepted the complaint for further examination under paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Chapter IV of the Guidelines. In December 2019 the Lawyers for Palestinians Human Rights ( LPHR) filed a complaint with the UK NCP against the UK-based company JC Bamford Excavators Limited ( JCB). This statement was published on 12 November 2021 by UK National Contact Point (UK NCP) for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |